EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORIGINAL DRUG BASED ON HEXAPEPTIDE SUCCINATE IN COMPLEX COVID-19 THERAPY IN ADULTS HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS
https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-6-573-588
Abstract
Currently, there are data that that make it possible to speak about a high clinical efficacy of the use of succinic salt of tyrosyl-D-alanyl-glycyl-phenylalanyl-leucyl-arginine (hexapeptide succinate) for the COVID-19 treatment. This article is devoted to the results of clinical trials of the original Russian drug based on it.
The aim of the study was to evaluate a clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of intramuscular and inhalation use of hexapeptide succinate in complex therapy in comparison with standard therapy in patients with moderate COVID-19.
Materials and methods. The research was conducted from February 28, 2022 to November 22, 2022 based on 10 research centers in the Russian Federation. The study included hospitalized patients (n=312) over 18 years of age with moderate COVID-19 who had undergone a screening procedure and were randomized into 3 groups: group 1 received standard therapy in accordance with the Interim Guidelines in force at the time of the study, within 10 days; group 2 received hexapeptide succinate (Ambervin® Pulmo) intramuscularly at the dose of 1 mg once a day for 10 days; group 3 received hexapeptide succinate (Ambervin® Pulmo) 10 mg once a day by inhalation for 10 days.
Results. According to the results of the study, therapy with the drug hexapeptide succinate, both intramuscular and inhaled, provided an acceleration of recovery up to the complete absence of the disease signs in more than 80% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. By the end of the therapy course with the drug, more than 60% of patients had met the criteria for discharge from hospital and could continue the treatment on an outpatient basis. About 70% of patients in the inhalation group and 80% in the intramuscular hexapeptide succinate injection group had concomitant diseases (hypertension – 28%, obesity – 14%), which indicates the effectiveness of this drug use in comorbid patients. The use of the drug contributed to the restoration of damaged lung tissues, normalization of oxygenation, the disappearance of shortness of breath and a decrease in the duration of the disease symptoms compared with standard therapy. As a result of a comparative analysis of adverse events in terms of their presence, severity, causal relationship with the therapy and outcome, there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups.
Conclusion. Thus, the results of the clinical study of the succinate hexapeptide efficacy and safety showed the feasibility of using the drug in pathogenetic therapy COVID-19 regimens.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. A. BalykovaRussian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Pediatrics, Director of Institute of National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
68, Bol’shevistskaya Str., Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia, 430005
O. A. Radaeva
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Immunology, Microbiology and Virology with a Course of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
68, Bol’shevistskaya Str., Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia, 430005
K. Ya. Zaslavskaya
Russian Federation
Assistant of the Department of Biological and Pharmaceutical Chemistry with a Course of Organization and Management of Pharmacy, National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University.
68, Bol’shevistskaya Str., Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia, 430005
P. A. Bely
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Senior Laboratory Assistant, Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases and Gastroenterology, Moscow State Medical and Dental University named after A.I. Evdokimov
Bld. 1, 20, Delegatskaya Str., Moscow, Russia, 127473
V. F. Pavelkina
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases with courses in Epidemiology, Phthisiology, Skin and Venereal Diseases, the Medical Institute of National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
68, Bol’shevistskaya Str., Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia, 430005
N. A. Pyataev
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, the Medical Institute of National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
68, Bol’shevistskaya Str., Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia, 430005
A. Yu. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Сardiologist, Ryazan State Medical University n. a. аcademician I.P. Pavlov; anesthesiologist-resuscitator, cardiologist of Regional Clinical Hospital, Ryazan
Bld. A, 3, Internatsionalnaya Str., Ryazan, Russia, 390039
9, Vysokovoltnaya Str., Ryazan, Russia, 390026
G. V. Rodoman
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Chief Physician of Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 24, Moscow City Health Department
10, Pistsovaya Str., Moscow, Russia, 127015
N. E. Kostina
Russian Federation
Head of the Department of Pulmonology, Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
151, Moskovsky Ave., Voronezh, Russia, 394066
V. B. Filimonov
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Urology with a Course of Surgical Diseases, Ryazan State Medical University n.a. academician I.P. Pavlov
9, Vysokovoltnaya Str., Ryazan, Russia, 390026
E. N. Simakina
Russian Federation
40, Frunze Str., Smolensk, Russia, 214006
Infectious Disease Specialist, Head of the Infectious Diseases Department of Smolensk Clinical Hospital No. 1, Smolensk
D. A. Bystritsky
Russian Federation
Specialist of the Organizational and Methodological Department of the Moscow Department of Health for infectious diseases, infectious diseases doctor, methodologist, Head of the department for the Provision of Paid Medical Services, Infectious Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow City Health Department
63, Volokolamsk Hwy, Moscow, Russia, 125367
A. S. Agafyina
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Medicine), Head of the Department of Clinical Research, City Hospital No. 40, Kurortny District, St. Petersburg
9B, Borisov Str., Sestroretsk, St. Petersburg, Russia, 197706
K. N. Koryanova
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Pharmacy), Associate Professor of the Department of Pharmacology with a Course of Clinical Pharmacology, Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute – branch of Volgograd State Medical University
11, Kalinin Ave., Pyatigorsk, Russia, 357532
D. Yu. Pushkar
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Urology, Evdokimov Moscow State Medical and Dental University; urologist, City Clinical Hospital named after S.I. Spasokukotsky, Moscow City Health Department; Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Bld. 1, 20, Delegatskaya Str., Moscow, Russia, 127473;
21, Vuchetich Str., Moscow, Russia, 127206
References
1. Bulgakov S.A. The use of agonists of opioid peptide receptors in the gastroenterological practice. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2015;4(1):14–8. DOI:10.17116/dokgastro201541-214-18. Russian
2. Hughes J, Smith TW, Kosterlitz HW, Fothergill LA, Morgan BA, Morris HR. Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity. Nature. 1975 Dec 18;258(5536):577–80. DOI:10.1038/258577a0
3. Goldstein A, Lowney LI, Pal BK. Stereospecific and nonspecific interactions of the morphine congener levorphanol in subcellular fractions of mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1742–7. DOI:10.1073/pnas.68.8.1742
4. Petrocelli G, Pampanella L, Abruzzo PM, Ventura C, Canaider S, Facchin F. Endogenous Opioids and Their Role in Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Rescue. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 30;23(7):3819. DOI:10.3390/ijms23073819
5. Fricker LD, Margolis EB, Gomes I, Devi LA. Five Decades of Research on Opioid Peptides: Current Knowledge and Unanswered Questions. Mol Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;98(2):96–108. DOI:10.1124/mol.120.119388
6. Kibaly C, Xu C, Cahill CM, Evans CJ, Law PY. Non-nociceptive roles of opioids in the CNS: opioids’ effects on neurogenesis, learning, memory and affect. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Jan;20(1):5–18. DOI:10.1038/s41583-018-0092-2
7. Eisenstein TK. The Role of Opioid Receptors in Immune System Function. Front Immunol. 2019 Dec 20;10:2904. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02904
8. Bulgakov S.A. Hexapeptide dalargin in clinical gastroenterology: 30 years’ of clinical application of the drug. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2016;26(3):103–12. DOI:10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-3-103-112. Russian
9. Shloznikov BM, Likhvantsev VV, Kuznetsov AIu, Peretrukhin AI, Tverskoĭ AL, Machulin AV, Grin’ko AN. Dalargin – osnovnoe sredstvo intraoperatsionnoĭ zashchity bol’nogo pri korrektsii defekta mezhpredserdnoĭ peregorodki v usloviiakh iskusstvennogo krovoobrashcheniia: novy metod anestezii [Dalargin – a basic means of intraoperative protection of a patient during correction of an atrial septal defect under conditions of artificial circulation: a new method of anesthesia]. Anesteziol Reanimatol. 1989 Jul-Aug;(4):21–5. Russian
10. Likhvantsev VV, Smirnova VI, Kuznetsov AIu, Peretrukhin AI,Kakurin FF, Grin’ko AN. Sravnitelńye aspekty primeneniia dalargina v komplekse anesteziologicheskoĭ zashchity pri khirurgicheskoĭ korrektsii vrozhdennykh porokov serdtsa [Comparative aspects of the use of dalargin in comprehensive anesthesiologic protection during the surgical correction of congenital heart disease]. Anesteziol Reanimatol. 1993 Jul-Aug;(4):23–8. Russian
11. Sharp BM. Multiple opioid receptors on immune cells modulate intracellular signaling. Brain Behav Immun. 2006 Jan;20(1):9–14. DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2005.02.002
12. Gein S.V. Opioidergic regulation of immune reactions. Molecular medicine. 2010; 4: 17–21. Russian
13. Franchi S, Moretti S, Castelli M, Lattuada D, Scavullo C, Panerai AE, Sacerdote P. Mu opioid receptor activation modulates Toll like receptor 4 in murine macrophages. Brain Behav Immun. 2012 Mar;26(3):480–8. DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2011.12.010
14. Brejchova J, Holan V, Svoboda P. Expression of Opioid Receptors in Cells of the Immune System. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 30;22(1):315. DOI:10.3390/ijms22010315
15. Zabrodin ON. To the noradrenergic component of the mechanisms of stress-limiting and healing effects of dalargin. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2016;14(4):61–6. DOI: 10.17816/RCF14461-66
16. Yasenyavskaya AL, Samotrueva MA, Bashkina OA, Andreeva LA, Myasoedov NF, Tyurenkov IN, Karaulov AV. Neuropeptide regulation of immunity. Immunologiya. 2018; 39(5-6): 326–36. DOI:10.18821/0206-4952-2018-39-5-6-326-336
17. Fara A, Mitrev Z, Rosalia RA, Assas BM. Cytokine storm and COVID-19: a chronicle of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Open Biol. 2020 Sep;10(9):200160. DOI:10.1098/rsob.200160
18. Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the `Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19. J Infect. 2020 Jun;80(6):607–13. DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.037
19. Chen R, Lan Z, Ye J, Pang L, Liu Y, Wu W, Qin X, Guo Y, Zhang P. Cytokine Storm: The Primary Determinant for the Pathophysiological Evolution of COVID-19 Deterioration. Front Immunol. 2021 Apr 28;12:589095. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2021.589095
20. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1033–4. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0
21. Thompson BT, Chambers RC, Liu KD. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1904–5. DOI:10.1056/NEJMc1711824
22. Petrov VI, Amosov AA, Gerasimenko AS, Shatalova OV, Ponomareva AV, Akinchits AN, Kulakova IS, Gorbatenko VS. Mechanisms of cytokine storm development in COVID-19 and new potential targets of pharmacotherapy. Pharmacy & Pharmacology. 2020;8(6):380-391. DOI:10.19163/2307-9266-2020-8-6-380-391
23. Zemskov DN, Balykova LA, Radaeva OA, Zaslavskaya KY, Bely PA, Semenova EV, Shirmankina MV, Koryanova KN. Current aspects of etiotropic COVID-19 therapy. Pharmacy & Pharmacology. 2022;10(5):432–45. DOI:10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-5-432-445
24. Parakhonsky AP. Regulation of the immune response by opioid peptides. Advances in current natural sciences. 2008;(10):77–8. Russian
25. Scientific Center for Biomedical Technologies of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency; Vinogradov VA, Skvortsova VI, Karkishchenko VN, et al. Using dalargin for producing agents for treating covid-19 coronavirus infection. Patent No. 2728939 C1 Russian Federation. 2020 March 03.
26. Ukrainskaya LA, Vasilieva LS. Limitation stress-induced light alteration by activating stress-limiting systems. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2002;31(2):28–9. Russian
27. Balachevsky BV, Kurzanov AN, Slavinsky AA. Dalargin-induced modulation of the functional and metabolic activity of neutrophilic leukocytes. Advances in current natural sciences. 2008;(5):75–7. Russian
Review
For citations:
Balykova L.A., Radaeva O.A., Zaslavskaya K.Ya., Bely P.A., Pavelkina V.F., Pyataev N.A., Ivanova A.Yu., Rodoman G.V., Kostina N.E., Filimonov V.B., Simakina E.N., Bystritsky D.A., Agafyina A.S., Koryanova K.N., Pushkar D.Yu. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORIGINAL DRUG BASED ON HEXAPEPTIDE SUCCINATE IN COMPLEX COVID-19 THERAPY IN ADULTS HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS. Pharmacy & Pharmacology. 2022;10(6):573-588. https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-6-573-588